Mack v. Holt
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Jesse James Mack appeals the rejection of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel during his trial. The state argues that the district court’s decision that Mack’s habeas petition was timely filed was in error. For the following reasons, we affirm.
Mack was convicted by a jury of two counts of first-degree murder, one count of second-degree murder, and one count of felony firearm. Mack shot and killed William and Jacqueline Rice, the parents of eleven-year-old Tameka Rice. Mack subsequently kidnaped Tameka,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Darron Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Dewitt McDonald, Jr. v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- James Dwight Thomas v. James CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- James Dwight Thomas v. James CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Mack v. Holt, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003