Darron Howard v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Darron Deon Howard (“Howard”) appeals from the denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. Howard claims that his counsel’s performance was deficient because counsel failed to argue either at sentencing or on direct appeal that certain criminal history points did not apply. For the following reasons, we REVERSE the district court’s judgment and REMAND for an evidentiary hearing as discussed herein.
I. BACKGROUND
In February 2006, the Grand Rapids Police Department was responding to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ricardo Arredondo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Jimmy Ray Valentine (04-2116) Kenneth Jerome Valentine (05-1877) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Samuel Demont BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vaughn Mitchell v. Duncan MacLarenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Darron Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Andrew Maurice Randolph v. Matt MacauleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Christopher Smith v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Inst.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. MaxwellDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013