Six Clinics Holding Corp., II v. Cafcomp Systems, Inc.

OPINION

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

This case comes to us upon interlocutory appeal of the District Court’s order granting plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction *396staying arbitration proceedings between the parties. We are asked to decide (1) whether the District Court lacked jurisdiction to grant the injunction under the Anti-Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2283, and (2) whether the issuance of the preliminary injunction was proper. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM.

I. Facts

A. Background

Defendant, Cafcomp, Inc. (Cafcomp), is an employee benefits administration company that provides…