Legal Opinion
Rees v. Scott
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 1958No. 8860PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDonough, chief justice.
This appeal challenges an order granting a motion to quash summons on the ground that the deputy sheriff who served it failed to put the date on the copy he left with the defendant.
Rule 4(j), U.R.C.P. prescribing the manner of service of summons provides:
“At the time of service, the person making such service shall endorse upon the copy of the summons left for the person being served, the date upon which the same was served, and shall sign his name thereto, and, if an officer, add his official title.”
It is urged that the omission of the date was inconsequential; that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thomas v. District Court of Third Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1946
3Cited by7 opinions
- Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Omark-Prentice Hydraulics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
- Autoridad de las Fuentes Fluviales de Puerto Rico v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1970
- Topham v. L. L. B. Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1973
- Dynapac, Inc. v. Innovations, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1976
- Ballard Ex Rel. Ballard v. BuistUtah Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.