Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ballard Ex Rel. Ballard v. Buist

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1959No. 8887Published

1DissentHenriod, Justice

I dissent, believing the main opinion misconceives the function of process, confuses the matter of jurisdiction over persons and subject matter and cites but one case which is no authority under the facts of this case.

The opinion asserts that an assault and battery action was commenced. Nothing was commenced. The purported process was no process at all since it purported to be that of someone sui juris, whereas plaintiff clearly was non sui juris,3 having no capacity whatever to have process issued in his name. The main opinion concedes this by admitting the process was vulnerable to attack…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ortega v. Salt Lake Wet Wash LaundryUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Rees v. ScottUtah Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API