Legal Opinion

Heenan v. Davis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 8, 1938No. 28005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

In order to enable her brother, C. M. Sewell, to go into the automobile business, Mrs. Grace Heenan, plaintiff in error, executed a promissory note payable to A. D. Davis, defendant in error. Davis alleges that she also executed a written agreement of guarantee of the indebtedness which Sewell might incur by virtue of borrowing money from Davis and upon automobile paper financed by Davis. Mrs. Heenan and her brother denied that there was such written agreement, and also asserted that Mrs. Heenan’s agreement was one only to hold Davis harmless on account of any collections Sewell might make on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, ConnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Hatch v. . ElkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Kkk Medicine Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Williams v. Casparis Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Livingston v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. BensoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Webster Drilling Co. v. Sterling Oil of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Minneapolis Brewing Company v. MerrittDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1956
  4. Davis v. CurrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Discover Bank v. WorshamCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API