City of New Orleans v. Hughes
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
By the WHOLE COURT.
ST. PAUL, J.
I think the writ should be refused.
The question of the territorial limits of the parish of Orleans is “probably a question of law,” but the question of the place where (i. e., the spot at which) the alleged offense is charged to have been committed is “undoubtedly a question of fact, * * * into which we cannot inquire.” State v. Foster, 8 La. Ann. 290, 292, 58 Am. Dec. 678. See also: Macarty’s Case, 2 Mart. (O. S.) 277, 278; State v. Tanner, 38 La. Ann. 307; State v. Nettles, 41 La. Ann. 323, 6 South. 562; State v. Starks, 42 La. Ann. 316, 7 South. 540; State v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. KlineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1853
- Isaac Freiberg & Bro. v. LangfelderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
- State v. NettlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of New Orleans v. PostekSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- City of New Orleans v. PostekSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934