Legal Opinion
City of New Orleans v. Postek
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 26, 1934No. Nos. 33022-33024PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAND, Justice.
The defendants Stanley Postek and Robert Watson are charged in No. 33022 with violating Ordinance No. 13,974, “relative to loitering, Sf. Ann Street and the River.”
The defendants Thomas McNeil, 'Robert Watson, and Fred Pierson are charged in No. 33023 with violating Ordinance No.. 1436⅛ § 1, “relative to being vagrants, additionally with having no visible means of support.”
The defendants Raymond Reitinger and Fred Bings, in No. 33024, are charged with being “dangerous and suspicious characters, pending investigation of a robbery.”. The defendant Bings was acquitted.
Ordinance No.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- L'Hote v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- State v. McCormickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Ex Parte StriitmatterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- City of Shreveport v. BowenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- State ex rel. Dowdell v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Parish Council of Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Louisiana Highway & Heavy Branch of Associated General Contractors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Morgan v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937