Legal Opinion
City of New Orleans v. Postek
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 26, 1934No. Nos. 33022-33024Published
1Opinion of the Court
LAND, Justice.
The defendants Stanley Postek and Robert Watson are charged in No. 3302-2 with violating Ordinance No. 13,974, “relative to loitering, St. Ann Street and the River.”
The defendants Thomas McNeil, Robert Watson, and Fred Pierson are charged in No. 33023 with violating Ordinance No. 1436, § 1, “relative to being vagrants, additionally with having no visible means of support.”
The defendants Raymond Reitinger and Fred Bings, in No. 33024, are charged with be-, ing “dangerous and suspicious characters, pending investigation of a robbery.” The defendant Bings was acquitted.
Ordinance…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- L'Hote v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- State v. McCormickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Ex Parte StriitmatterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- City of New Orleans v. ChappuisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- City of Shreveport v. BowenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.