Legal Opinion

Efstathopoulos v. Federal Tea Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 26, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

The primary question requiring decision in this cause is whether, at the time of the alleged accident, defendant’s employe was engaged in his master’s business so as to render the master vicariously liable for decedent’s death. We resolve the question affirmatively.

The action is under our Death act. Eespondent, plaintiff below, as the administrator ad prosequendum of the estate of his infant son, sought to impose liability upon appellant Federal Tea Company and its servant, James Burke, both defendants below, for the alleged wrongful death…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doran v. ThomsenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  2. Tischler v. SteinholtzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  3. Missell v. HayesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  4. Mahan v. WalkerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  5. Evers v. KrouseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. HeywardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  2. Hanstein v. KellyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
  3. Allard v. EisenhauerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
  4. Montrose v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API