Efstathopoulos v. Federal Tea Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Perskie, J.
The primary question requiring decision in this cause is whether, at the time of the alleged accident, defendant’s employe was engaged in his master’s business so as to render the master vicariously liable for decedent’s death. We resolve the question affirmatively.
The action is under our Death act. Eespondent, plaintiff below, as the administrator ad prosequendum of the estate of his infant son, sought to impose liability upon appellant Federal Tea Company and its servant, James Burke, both defendants below, for the alleged wrongful death…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doran v. ThomsenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Tischler v. SteinholtzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Missell v. HayesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Mahan v. WalkerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
- Evers v. KrouseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. HeywardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Hanstein v. KellyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
- Allard v. EisenhauerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Montrose v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1948