Allard v. Eisenhauer

OPINION

HILLMAN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court by way of Third-Party Defendant City of Sea Isle City’s motion [Doc. No. 24] seeking summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 with respect to Third-Party Plaintiff Carolyn Eisen-hauer’s claim that it is liable for Plaintiffs damages as Eisenhauer’s employer. The Court has considered the parties’ submissions and decides this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78.

For the reasons expressed below, Third-Party Defendant City of Sea Isle City’s motion for summary judgment will be denied.

I.…