Legal Opinion

Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Heyward

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 31, 1950No. 33084PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Ground 1 of the amended motion for a new trial assigns error on the following charge of the court: “A tort is within the scope of the servant’s employment if the servant in doing the act is motivated in part at least by a desire to serve his employer, and if it appears that the act out of which the tort originated was not an extreme deviation of the normal conduct of such employee.” It is urged that this excerpt from the charge states an erroneous principle of law in laying down the rule that only extreme deviation from the normal conduct of an employee…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. O'Dell v. Universal Credit Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Dolinar v. PedoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Rice v. Ware & HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Merry Bros. Brick & Tile Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  3. Lawrence Green v. Anthony Hill R.A. Sanders Robert E. Long Glenn Alred, Jr., and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Parsons v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. HansfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API