Legal Opinion

In re Schoepfer

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 3, 1997PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilkins, CJ.

In this appeal from an order of a single justice of this court indefinitely suspending the respondent, Stephen E. Schoepfer, from the practice of law, we are confronted with differing contentions concerning the appropriate discipline to impose. Bar counsel favors the indefinite suspension that the single justice ordered and a hearing committee (committee) of the Board of Bar Overseers (board) had recommended. The board recommends a suspension from the practice of law, preferably for a period of three years. The respondent urges a two-year suspension, which is the discipline that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In the Matter of AlterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. In the Matter of SaabMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. In the Matter of the Discipline of an AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. In the Matter of DawkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. In the Matter of BryanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In re HilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. In re CobbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. In re BrauerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. In re BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  5. In re BarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API