Legal Opinion

Wong Kay Suey v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States, Wong Poo Sing v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States, Emily Wong v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 14, 1959No. 14699-14701Published

1Opinion of the Court

266 F.2d 931

WONG KAY SUEY, Appellant

v.

William P. ROGERS, Attorney General of the United States, Appellee.

WONG POO SING, Appellant

v.

William P. ROGERS, Attorney General of the United States, Appellee.

Emily WONG, Appellant

v.

William P. ROGERS, Attorney General of the United States, Appellee.

Nos. 14699-14701.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued February 6, 1959.

Decided May 14, 1959.

Mr. Charles R. Richey, Washington, D. C., for appellants.

Mr. Harry T. Alexander, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., were…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. MurffSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Wong Kay Suey v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API