Legal Opinion

Wong Kay Suey v. Rogers

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 14, 1959No. Nos. 14699-14701PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

After the submission of these cases involving questions of derivative citizenship, the court addressed a communication to counsel for the parties to the effect that in view of the importance of the evidence of the result of blood tests of Wong Yem and Wong Kay Suey, and of the relationships of the parties, the court desired counsels’ advice as to the desirability of the cases being remanded to the District Court so that the record could be supplemented by evidence of blood tests of Wong Poo Sing; Wong Hung Hai, and Emily Wong. In response, counsel for the appellants and appellee have advised…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Ex Rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. MurffSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wong Kay Suey v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States, Wong Poo Sing v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States, Emily Wong v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API