Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. Murff

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 9, 1957No. 32PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In view of the representation in the Solicitor General’s argument at the Bar that the blood grouping test requirement here involved is presently and has been for some time applied without discrimination “in every case, irrespective of race, whenever deemed necessary,” and in view of our remand of the case, we need not now pass upon the claim of unconstitutional discrimination.

It appearing that the blood grouping tests made herein were in some respects inaccurate and the reports thereof partly erroneous and conflicting, the judgments heretofore entered are vacated and the case is remanded to…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Et Min Ng v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  2. Oi Lan Lee v. District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service at Los Angeles, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Wong Kay Suey v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  4. Wong Kwok Sui v. John P. Boyd, as District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service at Seattle, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. C-Y-LBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API