Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Berklowitz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1938No. Appeals, 180 and 181PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The defendants were charged with assault and battery, aggravated assault and battery, assault and battery with intent to ravish and with rape. They were tried by one jury, convicted on all indictments and sentenced. Their individual appeals will be considered in one opinion. We are compelled to reverse the judgments by reason of the failure of the trial judge to charge the jury as to its duty to consider whether the alleged victim made prompt complaint of the rape charged, written requests for such instructions having been submitted to the trial judge and refused.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MymaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Commonwealth v. ParrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  3. Stevick v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  4. Struppler v. RexfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Peoples Sav. Bank v. DenigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EberhardtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Commonwealth v. BerkowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. United States v. GoodmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. MantoothUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API