Legal Opinion
Ernst v. Jesse L. Riddle, P.C.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided February 25, 1997No. Civil Action 96-279-APublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS
JOHN V. PARKER, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on motions of defendants, Jesse L. Riddle, individually (hereinafter “Riddle”) and Jesse L. Riddle, P.C. (hereinafter “Riddle P.C.”). Pending before the court are the following motions filed by both defendants: 1) a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, 2) a motion for a protective order, and 3) a motion for reconsideration of an order granting plaintiffs motion to file supplemental authority or, alternatively, motion to strike. Also before the court are the following…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rankin v. City of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- St. Martin & Mahoney v. PattonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1994
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hawthorne v. Mac Adjustment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Arruda v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Brink v. First Credit ResourcesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1999
- Schwarm v. CraigheadDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Brumbelow v. Law Offices of Bennett & Deloney, P.C.District Court, D. Utah · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.