Legal Opinion

Upchurch v. Mount Carmel Health System

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 4, 2012No. Case No. 2:10-CV-1020PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*901 OPINION AND ORDER

ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case comes before the Court on Defendant Mount Carmel Health System’s (“Mount Carmel”) Motion for Summary Judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 on all the claims asserted against it by Plaintiff Robert Upchurch. (Dkt. 18.) Mount Carmel contends the factual record demonstrates that there are no genuine issues of material fact on the essential elements of Up-church’ claims. As explained more fully in its analysis herein, the Court finds that Mount Carmel has met its burden of proof, and it is entitled to judgment as a matter of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woida v. Genesys Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  2. Ball v. UpshiftDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  3. Favreau v. Liberty Mutual Group Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
  4. LETT v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API