Legal Opinion
Wright v. Oregon Metallurgical Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 11, 2004No. 02-35853PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:
The Oregon Metallurgical Corporation (“Oremet”) in the late 1980s established a stock bonus pension plan for its employees (the “Plan”). The Plan’s terms mandated that a defined minimum percentage of each Plan participant’s portfolio had to be invested in Oremet stock. Following Or-emet’s merger with another company, Or-emet employees Richard Wright, Greg Buchanan, and Darell Hagan (“Plaintiffs”) and other Plan participants requested that Oremet, the Oremet plan fiduciary, and former Oremet officers and pension plan administrators (“Oremet Defendants”) investigate…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINKSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Syncor Erisa Litigation v. Cardinal Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Langbecker v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative, & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Howell v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Edgar v. Avaya, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.