Grossen v. DeWitt
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
ORME, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellants seek reversal of the trial court’s dismissal of their counterclaim granted at the close of their case-in-chief. Because the facts as found by the trial court support dismissal, we affirm, even though appellants proved a prima facie case.
FACTS
¶ 2 In 1993, appellants Derel K. and Af-ton H. DeWitt entered into an agreement with Mary Ada Grossen, now deceased, and appellee Earl L. Grossen to purchase a parcel of property in Payson, Utah. Under that agreement, appellants signed a promissory note, which was secured by a trust deed in favor of the Grossens. Although…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Interwest Construction v. PalmerUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Aquagen International, Inc. v. Calrae TrustUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Trembly v. Mrs. Fields CookiesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Sorenson v. Kennecott Utah Copper Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Southern Title Guaranty Co. v. BethersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Gregory & Swapp, PLLC v. KranendonkUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- Fox v. Brigham Young UniversityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Clark v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. KihlstromCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.