Legal Opinion

Clark v. Clark

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2001No. 20000276PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

1 1 Defendant Ceeil E. Clark (Cecil) seeks certiorari review of the court of appeals' memorandum decision in favor of plaintiff Linda Kay Clark (Linda). The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's finding of an unsolemnized marriage pursuant to section 30-1-4.5 of the Utah Code and reversed the trial court's granting of Cecil's motion for relief from judgment due to lack of jurisdiction. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

12 Linda and Cecil had an eighteen-year solemnized marriage, which ended in divorce on August 27, 1985. Just a few months after the divoree was granted, Linda and Cecil…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HarmonUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Butterfield v. OkuboUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Platts v. Parents Helping ParentsUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re Marriage of GonzalezUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Craftsman Builder's Supply, Inc. v. Butler Manufacturing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Eggert v. Wasatch Energy Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. HolmUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Hutchings v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Wood v. University of Utah Medical CenterUtah Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API