In re the Care & Treatment of Quary
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
ATCHESON, J.:
Respondent William N. Quary appeals the judgment of the Cowley County District Court involuntarily committing him as a sexually violent predator following a bench trial. Quary argues- — correctly in our view — that the district court improperly handled evidence the State offered through a pair of psychological experts. First, Quary contends the district court should not have considered otherwise inadmissible information the experts relied upon in reaching their conclusions as substantive evidence supporting the State’s case. Second, he contends the expert *297reports themselves…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Pineda v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Michael E. QuintoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
- In re Care and Treatment of QuaryCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- State v. KempCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025