Legal Opinion

State v. Kemp

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 28, 2025No. 126238Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 126,238 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. LEVI WILLIAM KEMP, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Hearsay is generally inadmissible unless a statutory exception applies. K.S.A. 2023 Supp. 60-460(m) sets forth the requirements for a writing to meet the business- records exception to the rule against hearsay. 2. For a party to admit a domestic business record under K.S.A. 2023 Supp. 60- 460(m) without live testimony from the record's custodian or through a business-records subpoena, the party must produce a self-authenticating certification that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. BallouSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Topworth International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. State v. MagallanezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API