Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael E. Quinto
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 7, 1978No. 914, Docket 78-1027PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge:
While it is superfluous to say that the intent of a tax evader is to try “to screw the government out of some cash if [he can],” what makes this contested tax evasion case remarkable is that, according to the government, Quinto, the alleged tax evader here, was gracious enough to acknowledge to two Internal Revenue Service agents when interviewed by them that that is precisely what he was hoping to accomplish by failing to report approximately $15,000 of income over a two-year period. Not surprisingly, though, Quinto’s recollection of his interview with the IRS agents,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Paul v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. GrunewaldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Sandy CheckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Sun Myung Moon and Takeru KamiyamaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- United States v. Carlos Manuel Parodi, United States of America v. Edwin Barton Conway, United States of America v. Robert Lee LawsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.