Legal Opinion

In re Shyvers

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 24, 1940No. 32930-JPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COSGRAVE, District Judge.

Respondents contend that with the denial of certiorari on March 4, 1940, Shyvers v. Security-First Nat. Bank, 60 S.Ct. 608, 84 L.Ed.-, the jurisdiction of the U. S. District Court ceased, and that the entire matter was thereby set at large, the fund in question to be released to the debt- or, provided she exercised sufficient diligence before the claim of the bank was made effective. This premise is not sound, for the matter was still pending until the filing of the mandate from the Circuit Court of Appeals to the District Court on March 29, 1940. But assuming that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Adair v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. In re J. C. Winship Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
  4. Pacific Bank v. Madera Fruit & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Silverstein v. Oakland Title Insurance & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lord v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Vallelunga v. GomesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Lamb v. Ralston Purina CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  4. Price v. Louisiana Rural Rehabilitation Corp.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API