Pacific Bank v. Madera Fruit & Land Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Madera County settling the account of a receiver. W. M. Conley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
On January 31, 1894, the plaintiff filed its complaint and, among other things, asked for the appointment of a receiver to take charge of a large amount of real and personal property. One S. Ephraim was thereupon and at the request of the plaintiff appointed receiver of all the .property described in the complaint. He gave the proper bond, took the oath and thereupon took charge of said property as such receiver. Thereafter, on March 6, 1895, before the issuance of any summons or the appearance of any defendant, the plaintiff filed with the clerk a written dismissal of the ease, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Peterson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860
- Garniss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ireland v. NicholsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1870
- Whiteside v. PrendergastNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
- Field v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ephraim v. Pacific BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Ephraim v. Pacific BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Jun v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- United States v. CrockerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1961
- Highland Securities Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.