Legal Opinion
Nash v. Lerner
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 17, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Rodriguez, reported at 311 N.J.Super. 183, 193, 709 A.2d 799 (1998).
Justice POLLOCK has filed a separate dissenting opinion.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nash v. LernerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- Luchejko v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Luchejko v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Luchejko v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- WENDY CHERRY-HERNANDEZ VS. JOAO C. RIBEIRO (L-4646-16, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018