Legal Opinion · Dissent

Luchejko v. City of Hoboken

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 27, 2011No. A-38 September Term 2010, 066580Published

1DissentJustice Long

Today the Court leaves without recourse an innocent pedestrian, injured on the icy sidewalk of a 104 unit condominium complex, which assessed its members for snow and ice removal and for the procurement of liability insurance on its common elements, including its sidewalks.

In reaching that conclusion, with which I disagree, the Court interprets our decision in Stewart v. 104 Wallace St., Inc., 87 N.J. 146, 432 A.2d 881 (1981), as establishing a mere sorting exercise in which our role is to declare, into which predetermined category— commercial or residential — the landowner falls, without a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  3. Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Weinberg v. DingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. Sparks v. St. Paul InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API