Legal Opinion
Luchejko v. City of Hoboken
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 27, 2011No. A-38 September Term 2010, 066580Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
23 A.3d 912 (2011)
207 N.J. 191
Richard LUCHEJKO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The CITY OF HOBOKEN, CM3 Management Company and Skyline Condominium Association, Defendants-Respondents, and
D & D Snow Plowing Company, Defendant.
A-38 September Term 2010, 066580
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 15, 2011.
Decided July 27, 2011.
Denise Campbell argued the cause for appellant (Campbell Legal Associates, attorneys).
Robert C. Neff, Jr., Florham Park, argued the cause for respondents Skyline Condominium and CM3 Management Company (Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, attorneys; Mr. Neff and Mathew J.…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · LaVECCHIA; Dissent.
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.