Legal Opinion
Andreo v. Friedlander, Gaines, Cohen, Rosenthal & Rosenberg
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 12, 1987No. H-85-551 CivilPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT
BLUMENFELD, Senior District Judge.
This case arises out of transactions relating to the private placement of various limited partnership interests in satellite communication facilities. There are 67 plaintiffs who purchased interests in one or more of three limited partnerships. The defendants, who were involved in the transactions in various different ways, are a law firm, two public accounting firms, a lawyer/promoter, two named corporations, and unknown defendants designated as “John Does 1-25”…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Jeffrey Hecht v. Commerce Clearing House, Inc., William Miller, Louis Ceccoli, and Stanley StephensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Friedman v. Arizona World Nurseries Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family of La Cosa NostraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Landy v. Mitchell Petroleum Technology Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.