Legal Opinion
Painesville Bldg. Dept. v. Dworken & Bernstein Co., L.P.A.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 2000No. 1999-1769PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 564.] CITY OF PAINESVILLE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, APPELLANT, v. DWORKEN & BERNSTEIN CO., L.P.A., APPELLEE. [Cite as Painesville Bldg. Dept. v. Dworken & Bernstein Co., L.P.A.,
2000-Ohio-488.] Municipal corporations—Zoning—Political signs—Court of appeals’ judgment finding Section 1135.02(d) of the Codified Ordinances of Painesville unconstitutional affirmed. Planning and Zoning Code Section 1135.02(d) of the Codified Ordinances of the city of Painesville, which precludes the posting of political signs except during the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Portage Cty. Educators Assn. for Dev. Disabilities-Unit B, OEA/NEA v. State Emp. Relations Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. PillarOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Klein v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2003