Klein v. Leis
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentO’Connor, J.
{¶ 20} The majority incorrectly invokes a reasonableness test to assess whether R.C. 2923.12 infringes upon the fundamental constitutional right to bear arms. For reasons that follow, I believe that this statute should be subjected to intermediate scrutiny. After applying intermediate scrutiny, I conclude that while the overall objective of R.C. 2923.12 is constitutional, the framework of R.C. 2923.12(C) is not. Therefore, I must respectfully dissent.
I
Standing
{¶ 21} A preliminary issue raised by the appellants, but left unaddressed by the majority, is whether the plaintiffs have standing to…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Saenz v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.