Legal Opinion

Randle v. Inecto, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

Plaintiff moves to take the testimony in Tennessee and Mississippi respectively of two physicians who attended her. The action is brought to recover for injuries alleged to have been incurred as a result of a treatment sold by defendant. The latter meets this motion with a countermotion for an order dismissing the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, or in the alternative for an order requiring plaintiff to furnish security for costs.

Plaintiff is a resident of Mississippi; the cause of action apparently arose in Tennessee; and the defendant is a Delaware corporation doing business, however, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murnan v. Wabash Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Richter v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fifth & Walnut, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  2. Gilbert v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Shulman v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  4. Williamson v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Yesuvida v. Pennsylvania RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API