Legal Opinion
Richter v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 14, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
Motion by defendant to dismiss the complaint seemingly as a matter of discretion. Plaintiff is a non-resident and defendant is a foreign corporation. The action is to recover damages for injuries caused plaintiff as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendant through its agents and employe s *235in the state of Oklahoma. In order to bring the dase within the requirements of Subdivision 4, section 47 of the General Corporation Law (Laws of 1920, chap. 916), the complaint alleges that the defendant had two offices in the state of New York, one for the regular transaction of business and the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pietraroia v. New Jersey & Hudson River Railway & Ferry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Waisikoski v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Goodman v. Brooklyn Hebrew Orphan AsylumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Waisikoski v. . Philadelphia and Reading Coal Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gilbert v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Shulman v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Randle v. Inecto, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1928
- Murnan v. Wabash Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Yesuvida v. Pennsylvania RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.