Legal Opinion

Yesuvida v. Pennsylvania Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeldock, J.

Four motions made by the defendants in these four actions instituted to recover for personal injuries.

Defendant moves to dismiss the complaints in each of the four above-entitled actions, contending that this court should refuse jurisdiction upon the ground that each action involves a claim between nonresidents of this State for a tort committed in a foreign State.

The four plaintiffs, who reside in the city of Wilkes-Barre, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, were passengers in defendant’s train which was involved in a serious collision in the State of Ohio. Defendant is a foreign corporation…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Gregonis v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. International Milling Co. v. Columbia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Murnan v. Wabash Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shulman v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. Bullock v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API