Dynamic Solutions, Inc. v. Planning & Control, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
Plaintiff brings this action for copyright infringement, 17 U.S.C. § 501 et seq., and conversion and unfair competition under state law. The dispute concerns certain computer software, or “programs,” of which plaintiff claims ownership. Subject matter jurisdiction is predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a), (b) and principles of pendent jurisdiction. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(a).
Plaintiff moves pursuant to Rule 65, F.R. Civ.P., for a preliminary injunction barring defendants from using those programs or any computer programs based…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Apple Computer, Inc., a California Corporation v. Franklin Computer Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and GriggSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Apple Computer, Inc. v. Formula International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Heidi S. Weissmann, M.D., Cross-Appellee v. Leonard M. Freeman, M.D., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Brady v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Urantia Foundation, a Non-Profit Foundation v. Kristen MaaherraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- Pamfiloff v. Giant Records, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.