United States v. Whidbee
U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
BAUM, Chief Judge:
Appellants were tried separately on unrelated charges by two different general courts-martial, both convened by Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District. Each accused pled not guilty to all offenses 1 at trials before different officer members, presided over by two different military judges, one from the Navy and the other a Coast Guard officer. Despite the fact that the offenses and the courts-martial were unconnected, this Court, on its own initiative, has determined to consider the records together for decision because of a common dispositive issue relating to the trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. RemaiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. ThomasU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. HaleNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. LeeNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2011
- United States v. LynchU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. HaleNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017