Legal Opinion

United States v. Whidbee

U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review

Decided May 24, 1989No. CGCM 0010, 0013; Docket Nos. 909, 911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUM, Chief Judge:

Appellants were tried separately on unrelated charges by two different general courts-martial, both convened by Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District. Each accused pled not guilty to all offenses 1 at trials before different officer members, presided over by two different military judges, one from the Navy and the other a Coast Guard officer. Despite the fact that the offenses and the courts-martial were unconnected, this Court, on its own initiative, has determined to consider the records together for decision because of a common dispositive issue relating to the trial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  5. United States v. RemaiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. ThomasU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. HaleNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  3. United States v. LeeNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2011
  4. United States v. LynchU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. HaleNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API