Legal Opinion

McGeorge v. . Nicola

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 14, 1917PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Civil action-, from McDowell, heard by Justice, J., at chambers by consent, 23 March, 1916, upon exceptions to tbe report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

Plaintiff sued for tbe recovery of a large body of land, containing about 10,000 acres, claimed under several grants from tbe State. Tbe defendants denied tbe plaintiff’s title, which involves tbe question of the location of the several State grants and mesne conveyances which cover the locus in quo. After the pleadings were filed and the issues were raised, the case was by consent referred to Hon. W. D. Turner of Statesville, N. 0., and after taking evidence and hearing counsel for both plaintiff and defendant, the referee, on 25 November, 1915, filed his report, which is set out…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Usry v. . SuitSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. Buie v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Henderson v. . McLainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Southern Spruce Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Baggett v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Robertson v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Murphy v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Œttinger Lumber Co. v. W. I. Anderson & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Adickes v. . DrewrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Lumber Co. v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API