Legal Opinion

Œttinger Lumber Co. v. W. I. Anderson & Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 9, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The evidence taken before the referee, and upon which the judge made his finding as to the nonliability of the Leaksville Lumber Company as principal on the bond in suit, is not incorporated in the record; hence we are not able to say that the finding is without any evidence to support it. The presumption is otherwise. S. v. Jackson, 183 N. C., 695, 110 S. E., 593; McGeorge v. Nicola, 173 N. C., 707, 91 S. E., 708.

It is assumed, on appeal, in the first instance, that the judgment of the Superior Court is correct, and the party alleging error must show it. J ones v. Candler, ante, 382.

As no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Robertson v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. McGeorge v. . NicolaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. . FitzgeraldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API