Mellon v. Arkansas Land & Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford
The question in this case relates to the construction arid effect of the provision in § 206 of the Transportation Act, 1920, 1 which permitted suits on causes of action that had arisen during the Federal control of railroads to be brought thereafter against an Agent designated by the President. This section, in so far ,as here' material, pro vided that actions at law based on causes of action arising out of the operation by the President of the railroad of any carrier, might, after the termination of Federal control, be brought against “an ' agent. designated by the President for such purpose…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Davis v. L. L. Cohen & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Mellon v. WeissSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bailey v. HinesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Vassau v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hammond-Knowlton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Meredith v. United Air LinesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1966
- Robinson v. Trustees of the New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Wagner v. New York, Ontario and Western RailwayDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp. v. Grannis Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.