Legal Opinion

FAIRBURN BANKING COMPANY v. Gafford

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1994No. S93A1269PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Justice.

After this court affirmed without opinion the judgment against appellant (Fairburn Banking Co. v. Gafford, 262 Ga. XXVIII (1992)), appellees filed a motion in the trial court for attorney fees pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14 on the ground that appellant’s original complaint lacked substantial justification. The trial court granted the motion, interpreting the Code section to permit a motion for attorney fees to be made within 45 days of the final disposition of the case on appeal. To decide whether the phrase “final disposition of the action,” as used in OCGA § 9-15-14 (e), 1 means…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohran v. CarlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Department of Transportation v. Franco's Pizza & Delicatessen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Betallic, Inc. v. DeavoursSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Condon v. VickeryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Hill v. ButtramCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Rollins v. RollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  5. Fulton County Tax Commissioner v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API