Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Doe

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 8, 2008No. A08A1075, A08A1228PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

In this civil action to recover for injuries suffered when a transit patron was attacked in a transit authority parking deck, defendant Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) appeals a jury verdict of $1.7 million awarded to plaintiff Jane Doe, 1 arguing that the trial court erred in striking MARTA’s answer as a sanction for its intentional false response to a critical discovery request. We hold that for purposes of OCGA § 9-11-37 (d) sanctions, a defendant’s intentional false response to a discovery request equates to a total failure to respond and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. TiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Cone v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  3. Mayer v. Interstate Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Resource Life Insurance Co. v. BucknerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. ConleySupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  3. Resurgens, P.C. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  4. Howard v. AlegriaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Mincey v. Georgia Department of Community AffairsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API