Legal Opinion

Vance v. Superior Court of Sacramento County

California Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1891No. 13936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Petition to the Supreme Court to strike out amendments to a hill of exceptions and to settle the same. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This proceeding is in the form of an original petition to this court, in which it is stated, substantially, that the petitioner, Vance, was a defendant in a certain action in the court of respondent; that judgment having been rendered against him in said action, he presented to the respondent, judge of said court, a draught of a bill of exceptions which, it is averred, contained a true statement of the proceedings and evidence in said action; that the said judge changed said draught by striking out certain' things from its statement of said proceedings and evidence, and inserting certain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Landers v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burns v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Estate of Dolbeer v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Ryan v. LandisNevada Supreme Court · 1938
  5. People v. LapiqueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API