Pathe Computer Control Systems Corp. v. Kinmont Industries, Inc., Robert E. Margulies
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BREYER, Chief Judge.
The district court assessed a $7500 sanction against Robert Margulies, the plaintiff’s counsel in this case, because, in the court’s view, 1) a motion to transfer the case from Massachusetts to North Carolina “was brought for the purpose of delay,” and 2) counsel’s pursuit of his client’s “fraud” claim was not in “good faith.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. Counsel appeals the sanctions. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the first ground — the transfer motion — provides a legally adequate basis for a sanction, but the second ground does not.
I
Background
The essential background…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jose F. Escude Cruz v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- John Clark Donatelli v. National Hockey LeagueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of America, Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Southmark Corporation v. Life Investors, Inc., and Uslico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America v. 163 Pleasant Street Corporation, International Twist Drill (Holdings), Limited, United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America v. 163 Pleasant Street CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Kurker v. HellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Adelphia Recovery Trust v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In Re Bann Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Pfundstein v. Omnicom Group Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.