Legal Opinion
Pfundstein v. Omnicom Group Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 13, 1995PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
285 N.J. Super. 245 (1995)
666 A.2d 1013
ROBERT G. PFUNDSTEIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
OMNICOM GROUP INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 20, 1995.
Decided November 13, 1995.
Before Judges LONG, MUIR, Jr.[1] and BROCHIN.
Neal H. Klausner argued the cause for appellant (Davis & Gilbert, attorneys; Mr. Klausner and Howard J. Rubin, of counsel and on the brief).
Michael Patrick Carroll argued the cause for respondent (Roy E. Kurnos, attorney, and on the brief; Mr. Carroll, of counsel and on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by LONG,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dewey v. VOLKSWAGEN AGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Weber v. Jolly HotelsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Jacobs v. Walt Disney World, Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Citibank v. Estate of SimpsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Senju Pharmaceutical Co. v. Metrics, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.