Legal Opinion

Hill v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 20, 2014No. 1:12-cv-00390PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

26 U.S.C. § 6402 (reducing overpayments to cover outstanding liabilities); 28 U.S.C. § 1346; 31 U.S.C. § 3343 (check forgery insurance fund); 31 U.S.C. § 3716 (Treasury Offset Program); Pro Se; RCFC 56 (summary judgment).

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL JUDGMENT

BRADEN, Judge.

I. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND. 1

Mark A. Hill (“Plaintiff’ or “Mr. Hill”) is seeking payment of his misappropriated 2007 tax refund cheek for $1,182.46, as well as interest, punitive damages, and a ruling exempting this payment from the Treasury Offset Program, established by 31 U.S.C. § 3716. Compl. 4-5; see also PI. Mot.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Payne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  2. Rucker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API