Legal Opinion
Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency v. Jacobson
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Raymond Amyot, J.
The plaintiff in this condemnation proceeding moves for an order confirming the report of the commissioners which determines the full value of the realty condemned to be $143,102.96, all of which is awarded as damages to the owners of the subject premises and no part of which is allocated to the tenants.
The premises in question consist of improved commercial realty in the City of Amsterdam owned by the defendants Ellis L. Jacobson, Henry S. Jacobson and Samuel Seigal, testamentary trustees of a testamentary trust for the estate of Samuel Jacobson, deceased (hereinafter referred to as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- In re Delancey StreetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- In re HuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Irv-Ceil Realty Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- County of Rensselaer v. Mechanicville Golf Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency v. JacobsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978