Legal Opinion

Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency v. Jacobson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 23, 1978PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered July 8, 1977 in Montgomery County, which granted respondent’s motion for permission to file a supplemental appraisal report. The underlying controversy herein centers upon the condemnation of a certain premises owned by appellants Ellis L. Jacobson, Henry S. Jacobson and Samuel Seigal and partially leased by respondent Firestone Tire & Rubber Company (hereinafter, Firestone). Following a trial before three commissioners, it was determined by said commissioners that the subject property had a full value of $143,102.96, all of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Irv-Ceil Realty Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. Laken Realty Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  3. Binghamton Urban Renewal Agency v. LeveneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  4. Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency v. JacobsonNew York Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API