Legal Opinion

Burbridge v. Governing Body

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 23, 1990PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

This appeal focuses on the special reasons and negative criteria that guide a zoning board’s consideration of an application for a variance under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70d. The variance in question sought expansion of a pre-existing nonconforming use of the applicant’s property for commercial purposes in a residential zone.

Specifically, the variance, which was granted by the municipal zoning board of adjustment, allowed the applicant to expand the bounds of his automobile junkyard-storage area, which is one component of his auto salvage, repair,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  5. Riggs v. Township of Long BeachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Smart SMR of New York, Inc. v. Borough of Fair Lawn Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Price v. Himeji, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. Wyzykowski v. RizasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  4. Coventry Square, Inc. v. Westwood Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. Fallone Properties, L.L.C. v. Bethlehem Township Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API